New Entrants
Late September, the Republic of
Congo floated a new national flag carrier under the guidance of
Lufthansa Consulting. The President of the ECOWAS Commission also
recently called for a regional airline in the West African region.
Air Senegal, after many years of partnership with Royal Air Maroc,
finally packed up and has been replaced by Senegal Airlines. If the
truth must be told most countries in Africa would like to own their
own national flag carriers, and successful airlines like ET and KQ.
However, that is far from the reality.
Air Transport Is Critical
The relevance of air transport to
economies, especially in Africa is well documented. They stretch
from the need to provide social and economic linkages between
peoples of the same country, to linking the peoples so reached with
their neighbours in contiguous territories and beyond.
This need for linkages is made more
pressing in Africa by the obvious case of poor road network and
general weak transport infrastructure. Aside from these, air
transportation is seen as a national pride when the flag of nations
are seen in major capitals around the world.
However, more than a few of these
small communities are not able to profitably sustain air transport
on a commercial scale but may need the air services owing to
reasons of geography, etcetera. Obviously, private commercial
airlines do not see the need to provide air services to those areas
where they do not have potentials for good returns on investment.
Meanwhile, for several reasons including political and economic,
the national governments would like to reach these communities with
development and assist them integrate into the mainstream economy.
Some of these reasons have led several governments in time past to
set up national flag carriers to ensure that the lack of the
all-important air services do not asphyxiate economic and social
development and national integration.
The weak aviation manpower position
of many countries in Africa has also been explained by some as the
direct upshot of lack of national carriers. These reasons continue
to inform the position of many advocates for the establishment of
national carriers by countries.
The Death Of National Carriers
In the 1970s and 80s, African skies
were awash with the likes of Air Afrique, Nigerian Airways, Ghana
Airways, Air Tanzania, Kenya Airways, etcetera. However, by the 90s
and early 2000, these airlines were comatose owing to corruption,
government intervention and poor management. They were in huge
debts and depended on government handouts to pay salaries and to
maintain their fleets. They became, as it were, drains on
government revenue and instead of promoting the brand of their
countries they had become embarrassments to their governments.
These years, also coincided with the great wave of privatization
and commercialization, which blew away many airlines. Some like
Kenya Airways were privatized and handed over to the private sector
to run; others like Air Afrique and Nigeria Airways were liquidated
while others like South African Airways, Air Mauritius continued to
run, at constant financial loss to their owners.
Another Model
Today, no doubt, the need for air
transport services in Africa has not abated but may not only be
solved through the instrumentality of national carriers. The
conditions stated above remain true of many an African country. But
economically, the situation cannot be said to be the same. While
many African countries continue to grow at record GDP levels the
available funding to finance such huge airline projects do not
exist. Where the resources exist, insatiable social and health
sectors have imposed critical limits to funds that could be
available to "non-essential" sectors, including aviation. For
instance, in Nigeria the total budget of the aviation industry in
2011 was put at N28 billion (or roughly USD 182 million). In Kenya,
the expenditure for transport for the same period is USD 109
million. These figures when related to the market price of a narrow
body Airbus of Boeing aircraft speak for themselves.
The question then is: why have the
North African carriers continued to exist under government
ownership? The answer must obviously relate to the business models
of the airlines and their governments. But a look at these markets
show that the airlines are essentially allowed to exist as adjuncts
of virile tourism sectors which is not the case for many in the
West and Central parts of Africa. Ditto for Air Mauritius and Air
Madagascar.
The era of national carrier seems
definitely over. The resources cannot sustain them. Even in Europe,
the classical example is Alitalia. Yet the need to reach many
unreached people in Africa remains. Therefore, what is required is
not the classic national carrier but flag carriers. As Mr. Gbenga
Olowo, President of Sabre in Nigeria has argued the case is for
private sector flag carriers supported by government providing
enabling environment for them to thrive. The maladies that killed
many national carriers in Africa are still with us. The scarce
resources do not just support another season of experimentation
with national carriers.